Vanguard Cruciate Retaining (CR) Knee Design Features. Introduction. .. Ascent™ Total Knee Systems1–3 and combined state- of-the-art design features . Learn more about the Vanguard Complete Knee System from Zimmer Biomet. Zimmer Biomet’s Vanguard® Revision Knee System delivers customizable implant combinations to offer a personalized patient approach to revision knee.
|Published (Last):||17 March 2009|
|PDF File Size:||14.10 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||3.1 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
The benefits of the Vanguard Revision Knee System include: Knee revision surgeries are increasing every year and are jaxim complex and challenging. Of these, one was revised at 4.
Bone Joint J ;B: Failure was defined as revision for any reason; all patients that failed regardless of the onee of followup remained in the analysis. For example, one of the most widely cited studies critical of surface cementation exhibited high failure rates with a macrotextured waffle-pattern tibial base plate [ 31 ].
Distribution to any other recipient is prohibited. Pelt and Christopher L.
Knee Replacement Products
Mean followup was 8 years, including those who failed prior to five years range, 0. However, they report that overall, only Provides options to enhance intraoperative performance — Available in a variety of tray sizes, thickness, and articulation to address kknee soft tissue scenarios: Although support for the technique of surface cementation with biomef designs of the tibial component exists in the literature, [ 2428 ] other studies have demonstrated higher failure rates with this technique [ 2029 ].
X Patients and Caregivers Medical Professionals. Please select a location and click search to find an associate near you. Given these biomechanical studies and our clinical results, the authors utilize the surface cement technique commonly and make no alterations to postoperative rehabilitation protocols, allowing for immediate weight bearing as tolerated and rapid recovery techniques without compromise.
BioMed Research International
Patients were followed according to a prospective clinical and radiographic protocol for primary and revision TKA that has been consistently used at our institution sincewith scheduled followup at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, and every years thereafter. Radiographic measurements including femoral and tibial coronal and sagittal alignment, as well as overall anatomic valgus angle hip knee ankle angle.
Retention of the tibial component during revision of the femur, patella, or polyethylene insert occurred in 18 4. Introduction Although results of tibial component fixation biimet cement in total knee arthroplasty TKA have been good, [ 1 — 14 ] the ideal technique of cementing is still debated [ 15 — 18 ]. The Vanguard Knee System offers an entire spectrum of knee stability, including: The design features and instrumentation allow surgeons to achieve optimal maxmi positioning and efficiently address unique patient anatomies.
Patients were included in the study, if they had received a modular titanium baseplate with a cruciform keel using a surface cemented technique and had a minimum five-year followup or failure of the TKA prior to five years.
Gait comparison of unicompartmental and total knee arthroplasties with healthy controls. This flexibility provides options to effectively address bone loss, which works to deliver personalized patient care. Additionally, knees did not meet the inclusion criteria and had not failed at last followup and were therefore excluded.
Long-standing anteroposterior view of lower extremities and weight-bearing anteroposterior, lateral and merchant radiographs were obtained at six weeks. Two cases of suspected aseptic loosening of the tibial component were identified and very few knees demonstrated radiographic radiolucencies.
Knee Replacement | Total Knee Arthroplasty | Partial Knee Products
OrthoSensor supported clinical study and Whitepaper, Values less than were considered statistically significant. We have confirmed previous reports of good results using a surface cementation technique of the tibial maxin. Finally, our conclusions must be limited to similar technique and implants.
We identified only 3. The mobile bearing systems feature advanced stability and wear characteristics, and our posterior stabilized systems are designed to accommodate the restoration of high-flexion daily activities. It’s our promise to look beyond what’s possible now and discover what’s possible next. The independent fit of the femoral, tibial, and patellar components allow surgeons to provide tailored patient care.
Data on file at Zimmer Biomet.
There was a high loss of followup, in the part related to the large geographic region of referral for our tertiary academic medical center. The remainder of the femoral preparation was performed with the use of a standard posterior referencing guide with the goal of rotational alignment being parallel to the epicondylar axis using a measured resection technique.